Gambling: Should online gambling be banned, online casinos should be banned.

Online casinos should be banned



New casino sites to play real money


Gambling: Should online gambling be banned, online casinos should be banned.


Gambling: Should online gambling be banned, online casinos should be banned.


Gambling: Should online gambling be banned, online casinos should be banned.


An entire bank balance and monthly pay can be lost before someone has even left the house in the morning through a few spins of a roulette wheel or a sports game that has not resulted in the gamblers favour. Those arguing that it is peoples' choice to gamble such large amounts are clearly out of touch with the reality and severity of the problem that many face. At the very least, A stricter limit on bet sizes would be a step in the right direction. Online gambling and poker makes me crazy. Once I was so mad after a huge loss that I wanted to put myself on fire. Many of my relatives and friends are addicted to online gambling. I know for a fact that they have all suffered a lot from it. Even if you close your accounts you can still just open another account somewhere else. It is impossible to self exlude from online gambling and there are minimal treatment option for this kind of addiction. Ban it already


Gambling: should online gambling be banned?


Stop it now.


It serves only the casino proprieters. It preys on weak willed participants who are often the least able to afford to lose money. There are no positive arguments which might oppose the banning of this predatory curse on society. Digital ntechnology is a wonderful thing, it can be put to much better use than the destruction of peoples lives by preying upon their weaknesses.


Gambling destroys families


My husband started online gambling in secret. He prevented us from having a secure life and couldn’t pay for his part of his daughter’s wedding. He withdrew from family life, lied and blamed other members of the family for our financial hardship. He did not work properly or run our business for any other reason other then funding his gambling. There is no trust left in our relationship it’s destroyed me.


Way too accessible.


An entire bank balance and monthly pay can be lost before someone has even left the house in the morning through a few spins of a roulette wheel or a sports game that has not resulted in the gamblers favour. Those arguing that it is peoples' choice to gamble such large amounts are clearly out of touch with the reality and severity of the problem that many face. At the very least, A stricter limit on bet sizes would be a step in the right direction.


Gambling should be banned


Yes. Betting should be banned. It is actually addictive and a disease. You can't succeed in life through betting. It just teaches you shortcuts of life. Betting firms should adhere to the law and pay taxes. Betting cannot build this economy. It has really corrupted our young people. Life is not all about money and quick fixes.


It's too easy to use credit, debit cards too gamble money people just do not have


It's easier to gamble thousands of pounds on line than it is to buy a pair of shoes
or book a holiday. If you use your card to try and buy something you have not before there's a good chance your bank will not honour the sell, spend thousands increase your over draft and you can gamble all you can get your hands on, no stopping, no questions asked the banks know it's a gambling site and yet they let you continue the BANKS can and must at the very least limit the amount you can spend in one go, it may just give gamblers a chance to come to their sense or at least a fighting chance have look how many more people have access to gamble now with 24 hr online gambling it has to stop, the USA has band it.


Please ban it


Online gambling and poker makes me crazy. Once I was so mad after a huge loss that I wanted to put myself on fire. Many of my relatives and friends are addicted to online gambling. I know for a fact that they have all suffered a lot from it. Even if you close your accounts you can still just open another account somewhere else. It is impossible to self exlude from online gambling and there are minimal treatment option for this kind of addiction. Ban it already


WBBL, BBL, test cricket, one day games & all sporting events


I am disappointed to see still 7 & 7mate advertising during the WBBL, BBL, test cricket, one day games advertising junk food KFC, mc donald’s with children in the ads, betting, ( pointsbet, bet365 ) at the start of play and on the grounds boundary line and the fence. Alcohol, jim beam, iron jack, canadian club, hahn, during the games day and night during the banned times and targeting children gamblers and alcoholics and not comply with the australian association of national advertisers’ code for advertising to children, and the food and beverages betting advertising & marketing communications code. 6. 3 – 6. 6 and gambling representatives must not be, or appear to be, at or around the ground from 30 minutes before the scheduled start of the sporting event, until 30 minutes after play ends gambling promotional content of all kinds is prohibited during play.
You also mention in your unsinged reply that it would not be possible for commercial broadcasters to fun the production and acquisition costs of our programs or provide the to every household totally free of charge and with advertising funds what a load of crap. I don’t think we viewers accept that targeting the venerable people while your station is a contributor to destroying love ones and their life.
The game of cricket where children & young adults boys & girls watching and on the grounds and encourage them to take part be active channel 7 & 7mate starts advertising just before the game start till the finish from 6pm to 10 pm in all games targeting junk food, betting, alcohol and also in the day and night games WBBL, BBL games 2pm – 6pm and test cricket games was advertised junk food, betting, alcohol on school holidays watching sports take a example from woolworth healthy food with children KFC mc donald’s junk food with children in the ads. Betting alcohol liquor and fast food should be banned before and after all sporting telecast and in and around the grounds.


Ban it now


I don't give a shit about the sad fuckers losing all their cash, im just sick of efbet popup adverts online the whole while. I cans browse anything these days without some kind of bullshit gambling adverts. I never gamble, hate gaming and sports and only go online for science or torrent sites


Problem gambling costs society billions annually.


The social costs of gambling addictions will eventually impact careers, physical and mental health issues, bankruptcy, divorce, crimes, and treatment. It is a disease, a very serious addiction.The gamblers will eventually rely on welfare or unemployment benefits, impacting the government, and the costs could reach several billions of dollars per year.


Gambling is terrible


It’s just bad. Advertisements are even luring kids in to this terrible world. While some kids might be watching peppa pig on youtube, there might be a ‘sportsbet or bet 365’ ad come on screen. This only leads kids wanting to do this because they thought peppa pig might do it as well. It wrecks lives.


It's my choice to do what I want with my money.


When we were all kids and we got our hard earned money and we wanted to do stuff with our money but our parents said no we hated it, but now that we are 18 and or older we have freedom but some things that we want to do we still cant. The governments job is not to babysit us and tell us what we can and cannot to do with our hard earned money. I understand that you can get an addiction but that is our issue to handle not theirs.


It's a waste of money


My dad was getting stuff in walmart and he had to fight a lady with a fish for my new phone. It was all because of that lady's gambling addiction. If she didn't have one my dad wouldn't have gotten slapped by a bass or a rainbow trout. He smells now.


Government can’t enforce an online gambling ban- they can only stop domestic companies, even if they block international sites there is ways around it


Governments can’t physically enforce a ban on the world wide web they can only enforce a ban on internet companies, they cannot stop their citizens from gambling on a overseas site or from people creating different online gambling. Also this doesn’t stop gambling all together people can still gamble in casinos instead of online. Gambling can’t actually be stopped and it can’t be enforced. There is always a way a loop hole on the internet to download something. To prove this is possible there are still big problems with piracy, such as movies, TV shows, games and music. A global piracy study was taken in 2010 showing that 95% of music from online was downloaded illegally and that 2/3 of torrents online are illegal. This statistics show that you can ban something but that doesn’t stop it from happening meaning this will just happen with online gambling. Remember if the united states have an economic loss of $12.5 million just due to the piracy of music what will happen to our economy if 70% of our nation gamble in one way or another?


Raise taxes with it


Online gambling shouldn't be banned because federal, state and local governments can tax the heck out of it and make some revenue from the proceeds. Tax incentives are what fuel brick-and-mortar casinos, so the same can be done with online gambling. Offshore tax havens can be taxed by having the taxes originate from the country where the client is, not where the casino is based. Any "sin taxes" can help--if someone can afford to gamble, they should be able to pay a couple of percent in taxes to have the right to do so.


Gambling is a choice.


Gambling should not be banned. It is a choice. It may be a stupid choice but it is still a choice that one should be allowed to make. If I want to spend my college tuition on gambling instead of going to school I should be allowed. If I choose to gamble instead of making my house payment I am the one who is going to suffer the consequences. Nobody else is going to suffer. Why should anyone else be concerned with my gambling habits. It is none of their business.


Why gambling is good and should not be banned


Gambling: Should online gambling be banned, online casinos should be banned.


There is no need to argue, but gambling became very popular today. More and more people start playing online every day. Why does it happen? Is this just an entertainment or an additional source of income? Should casinos be banned? We’ll try to answer all these questions because the opinions about online gambling are entirely different today.


In current times, there is a bunch of online casinos. It means that if you have a desire to try your luck, you can pick up the best online crap joint, and immerse yourself in the gameplay without the necessity to visit this casino personally. For instance, qatar online casino website offers a wide array of online games. It means that gamblers don’t feel the lack of choice. They will always find a fantastic online activity to spend time during a coffee break or pass the time in the evening.


Gambling: Should online gambling be banned, online casinos should be banned.


Nevertheless, some users consider that gambling is illegal and it should be banned. Why do they think so? Is it possible to do this?


The key reasons why online gambling should not be banned


Though some people consider all kinds of casinos illegal, that’s not true. Going by that logic, alcohol, drugs, and cigarettes should also be banned. If a person can’t control the situation, this is not the problem of the manufacturer of alcoholic beverages or cigarettes. The same is with the online gambling.


Below, you can find the main reasons why the gambling area should not be banned.


1. This is just pure fun.


Every person has a choice. The same is with the gambler. The principal purpose of this area is to provide a player with the feeling of risk. It also brings entertainment. Thus, it is not honest to blame the gambling industry only because players can’t control themselves. If you are a gambling person who simply can’t stop, you shouldn’t play for real money at all.


2. Gambling doesn’t influence the society.


This is a good method of relaxation for some people. After a hard working day, they come to a brick-and-mortar or online casino and relax. Some experts consider that this is a form of therapy allowing players to switch the attention.


It also helps train some skills. When you play some games, you develop your strategy. You think of how you should behave in one or another situation. Thus, you not only relax but train your brain as well.


Gambling is a choice of a person. It can’t influence the whole society.


3. Casinos attract tourists.


Gambling: Should online gambling be banned, online casinos should be banned.


If a casino is located in a tourist place, it will attract players from different countries. For instance, people come to this city in order to have a rest, enjoy the sea, etc. In the evening, they visit casinos, relax, play and win! Otherwise stated, this is a fair opportunity to vary their vacation.


4. People should be at liberty.


The government can’t decide for everyone what activities are legal and which ones should be banned. People have the right to choose how they want to spend their free time. Even if this activity is banned, they will always find the ways to get around the law and continue playing. For that reason, the prohibition on online gambling will not work. Truly gamblers will always see how to access their favorite casinos or find the other ones to experience the gameplay.


5. It boosts the economy of the country.


Legalized gambling can boost the economy of the country. This is an additional source of income allowing the government to cover some expenses. When casinos are illegal, it means the country loses the additional revenue.


Gambling should be banned!


Gambling: Should online gambling be banned, online casinos should be banned.
Gambling: Should online gambling be banned, online casinos should be banned.
Gambling: Should online gambling be banned, online casinos should be banned.
Gambling: Should online gambling be banned, online casinos should be banned.


Voting style: open point system: 7 point
started: 3/30/2013 category: entertainment
updated: 6 years ago status: post voting period
viewed: 10,392 times debate no: 31903

Gambling: Should online gambling be banned, online casinos should be banned.


Gambling: Should online gambling be banned, online casinos should be banned.


Gambling: Should online gambling be banned, online casinos should be banned.


"however, when done occasionally, gambling has some advantages". Exactly, majority of people cannot do it occasionally. When the man begin to play, it becomes interesting for him. He wants more and more. Then he becomes a slave of the game. Further, it everything leads to addiction " is terrible thing.


At the present time we have so much other fun which can give us not only fun and good mood, at the same time they can be beneficial for us, for our health: going to the picnic and play volleyball, surfing, and to enjoy by weather, talk with friends. To play football with friends, go to the bowling etc. We can find other entertainment instead of gambling.


I agree that gambling can influence to the economy positively but not so much that economy can base on it! Gambling has a lot of disadvantages than advantages. " A recent research reveals that in america, approximately 2.5 million adults suffer from compulsive gambling, about 3 million are considered problem gamblers, around 15 million adults are under the risk of becoming problem gamblers and 148 million fall under the low risk gambler category". - http://rehab-international.Org.
""according to a 1990 maryland department of health and mental hygiene survey, 62 percent of problem gamblers in treatment had committed illegal acts as a result of their gambling, 80 percent had committed civil offenses""" - http://erlc.Com.


Gambling: Should online gambling be banned, online casinos should be banned.


My opponent and I have both been using the term “gambling addiction”. Allow me to explain what this is. A gambling addiction is not a true addiction but rather an obsession that can be controlled by the individual. A true addiction is characterized by biological process that the individual has no control over. Gambling addiction, problem gambling being a more accurate term, is based on “habitual and poorly informed choices”. This means gambling is not to blame but rather the gambler for having a “gambling addiction”.


This debate is about whether or not gambling should be legal, so let me draw attention to other questionable things that are legal. Alcohol is the second most consumed drug in the world after caffeine and it can be very addictive. Yet it is legal. Alcoholism affects about 5%-10% in males and about 3%-5% in females. This is more addictive than gambling “addiction” which only affects about 3% of people. Also, alcohol affects the health of the body and not only the finances and family relationships like gambling. In my opinion, alcohol is a much bigger problem than gambling. So why should alcohol be legal and gambling not?


As we have already established, gambling addiction is based on poor decisions. As my opponent said in the previous round, "according to a 1990 maryland department of health and mental hygiene survey, 62 percent of problem gamblers in treatment had committed illegal acts as a result of their gambling, 80 percent had committed civil offenses". These problem gamblers are already known to make poor decisions, so who’s to say they wouldn’t commit these crimes without the catalyst of gambling. I don’t believe that is a very valid argument.


I would now like to make an argument. A lot of games in gambling involve probability or some kind of strategy. This could make gambling a good way to sharpen your mind. I believe this undermines the problem that gambling is not very beneficial to the body’s physical health.


Reasons why gambling should be illegal


What are the adverse effects of gambling? How does it affect society? Should gambling be legal? We don't think so and here we bring you an article that discusses the reasons why gambling should be illegal.


Gambling: Should online gambling be banned, online casinos should be banned.


What are the adverse effects of gambling? How does it affect society? Should gambling be legal? We don’t think so and here we bring you an article that discusses the reasons why gambling should be illegal.


Gambling refers to the process of staking money in view of gaining more. When it comes to making money, one has to draw a line between need and greed. Gambling is something that blurs this line. It tempts you to risk more in an attempt to win more and the cycle does not seem to end. In case you lose money, you want to earn it back and if you earn money, you are tempted to gain more. Caught in the cycle, you keep gambling for hours. And then you do it regularly. It becomes a habit you cannot break.


Over time, you may get addicted to gambling. In the process, you end up losing large sums of money. Even if you win, your greed to win more might never end. The activity that started as a game of winning or losing money might take a bad turn and lead you to criminal activities. Gambling may breed ill-practices that have adverse effects on your family and social life. Perhaps, a good solution to prevent the damaging effects of gambling is to make it illegal.


Why gambling should be illegal


Gambling invites problems


Gambling is meant to serve as a recreation. People engage in gambling activities to get rid of their problems, stress, and loneliness. But most often, the contrary happens. Gambling often turns out to be a thoughtless splurge of money and a waste of quality time. It invites problems.


Gambling leads to crime


Gambling can lead people to crime. Those addicted to it fail to think wisely before taking any decisions in life. The addiction forces them to risk huge amounts of money. It may lead them to a stage where they cannot stop themselves from betting money and valuables, in turn leading them to bankruptcy. Those addicted to gambling are often seen giving up their jobs and careers, thus spoiling their lives.


Compulsive gambling can ruin life


Problem gamblers or compulsive gamblers as they can be called, feel compelled to bet money with the intent to win more. Irrespective of whether they lose or win money, their addiction to gambling forces them to continue staking it. It may land them into huge debts. Lack of funds to repay the loans may leave them incapable of shouldering responsibilities towards their family. In this case, the family members have to face hardships and economic problems, or they may decide to separate, sharing no responsibility of the money lost.


It’s addictive


Gambling is so addictive, that it won’t be wrong to compare it with drugs. Similar to how substance abuse has devastating effects on a personal and social level, even gambling is detrimental to both these aspects of living. That’s one reason why it is wise to outlaw it.


Gambling affects finances


Though one may argue that gambling is only a means of recreation and that it should be taken as a form of entertainment, truth is that it is seldom taken that way. Gamblers consider it to be a business, an investment, or a way to earn money. They take irresponsible decisions about staking money and risk amounts they don’t even have. This leads to huge debts they may never be able to repay. The prohibition of gambling by law is an effective measure to discourage people from its damaging effects.


It’s fruitless


Money that could have been invested in better ways or put to better use is lost in gambling. Money just changes hands between the gamblers and is never really put to any worthy use. It keeps circulating between those involved in gambling, and they keep switching between rich, richer, poor, and poorer. Gambling can make the rich poor and the poor rich, within seconds; that too only out of luck. It is tempting to bet money, hoping for a bigger win every time. The allurement is not easy to overcome. And hence it’s best done by law.


Gambling leads to malpractices


Gambling leads people to borrow money and take secret loans for betting. These practices can best be prevented through law. Generally, people fear to do something that is illegal. They prefer to remain away from anything that is banned by law. Thus, if gambling is made illegal, its detrimental effects may be substantially reduced.


Making gambling illegal can solve many of the problems associated with it. Crime is best curbed through the use of law and order. If addiction to gambling is entitled to punishment, gambling practices will become less prevalent or may even stop completely. Strict laws against gambling, punishments or penalties to those caught, and surveillance, can prevent the number of people engaging in gambling activities.


Agree or disagree: gambling should be banned


I agree with the statement that gambling should be banned. There are three reasons for this opinion. There would be more criminal activity if society allowed gambling, gambling negatively affects family relations, and gambling could lead to health problems.


Gambling is often the cause of criminal activities. Mafia members could use the money for illegal or dangerous purposes. So, I recommend that we do not have gambling facilities. Also, gamblers could start fighting each other or cause problems about money.


Gambling could affect family relations, because gamblers focus on gambling too much and they do not take care of their families. Thus, gambling could be the cause of divorce or domestic violence. For example, if a father gambles too much and does not come home until late at night, it could harm his relationship with his family.


Finally, gambling could have negative effect on health, because gambling too much could make people too excited and they would be unable to maintain good health. For instance, gamblers might stay up late at night to gamble for long hours so they could easily catch a cold or become ill.


In conclusion, gambling should be banned because there would be more criminal activities if people allowed it, it would negatively affect family relations, and it could damage people’s health.


I agree with the statement that g ambling should be banned.


There are three reasons to support my idea. (better: "there are three reasons I believe this:" or "I have three reasons for this opinion:" although I think that "reasons to support" is grammatically valid, I don't know that I've ever heard it phrased like that. I recommend combining this sentence and the next with a colon, but that's a stylistic choice.)



    these reasons are that there would be more criminal activities if the society allowed gambling, gambling affect negatively for the family relations, and gambling could lead to health problems.

These reasons are that there would be more criminal activit y if the society allowed gambling, gambling affect negatively affects for the family relations, and gambling could lead to health problems.



    One of the reasons that gambling should be banned is that gambling could be the cause of criminal activities.

One of the reasons that gambling should be banned is that G ambling could be is often the cause of criminal activities. (you have introduced your thesis with your three points, and so it makes sense that this paragraph will be the first topic in detail, without repeating the main point. I think gambling has been linked to crime often enough - google "gambling and crime" for a bunch of articles - that you can state this without weakening it with "could be.")


Mafia members could use the money for illegal purposes or dangerous purposes reasons .


So, it is I recommend ed that we not to have gambling facilities.



    The other reason is that gambling could affect on family relations, because gamblers focus gambling too much and they do not take care of their families.

The other reason is that G ambling could affect on family relations, because gamblers focus on gambling too much and they do not take care of their families. (you can only use "the other ____" when there are only two options.)


So thus , gambling could be the cause of divorce or domestic violence. (starting a sentence with "so" is okay in informal writing, but "thus" or "therefore" or "because of this" are better for formal writing.)



    for example, if father gamble too much and do not come home until late at night, it could influence badly of the family relationship.

For example, if a father gamble s too much and do es not come home until late at night, it could influence badly of the family relationship harm his relationship with his family .



    One more reason is that gambling could have negative effect on health, because gambling too much could make people too excited and they could not keep good health conditions.

One more reason is that finally, gambling could have negative effect on health, because gambling too much could make people too excited and they could not keep good health conditions would be unable to maintain good health . ("finally" or "lastly" are better choices to introduce your final argument in a paper like this.)


For instance, gamblers would might stay up late at night to gamble for long hours ,


S o , they could easily catch a cold or become ill.



    As a conclusion, gambling should be banned, because there would be more criminal activities if people allowed it, it would affect negatively on family relations, and it could damage people’s health.

As a in conclusion, gambling should be banned , because there would be more criminal activities if people allowed it, it would affect negatively affect on family relations, and it could damage people’s health. ("in conclusion" is a set phrase.)


How do you feel about state-sponsored gambling, like lotteries? A lot of states in the US have lotteries that pay for things like schools and transportation systems. I'm sure there are people who spend too much money on them, but I like that the money goes to good causes.


Gambling should be illegal: top 5 reasons why


Whether gambling is legal or illegal, there will always be gamblers. Wanna bet? We still think it should be illegal. Read on for reasons why…


Gambling: Should online gambling be banned, online casinos should be banned.


Gambling: Should online gambling be banned, online casinos should be banned.


Gambling: Should online gambling be banned, online casinos should be banned.


Gambling: Should online gambling be banned, online casinos should be banned.


Gambling: Should online gambling be banned, online casinos should be banned.
Gambling: Should online gambling be banned, online casinos should be banned.
Gambling: Should online gambling be banned, online casinos should be banned.
Gambling: Should online gambling be banned, online casinos should be banned.
Gambling: Should online gambling be banned, online casinos should be banned.


Gambling: Should online gambling be banned, online casinos should be banned.


The main difference between legal and illegal gambling is that legal gambling is monitored by government inspections agencies. But more people gamble because it is legal, and although the government collects taxes on jackpots, indian casinos and lotteries, the system is highly subject to fraud.


Gambling online is illegal (federally), but this doesn’t stop people from doing it. And even though the organized crime section of the department of justice found that “the rate of illegal gambling in those states which have some legalized form of gambling was three times as high as those states where there was not a legalized form of gambling,” we still believe that gambling is a drain to society. Here are our top 5 reasons why.


Reasons why gambling should be illegal


1. Gambling is subject to fraud.


Legalized gambling, specifically indian gaming, is the fastest growing industry in the world, and can have a corrupting influence on state government. The governments are addicted to the revenue received from indian gaming and lotteries. Recently there have been numerous news reports of corruption and fraud in state lotteries.


2. Availability of gambling facilities increases risk of problem gambling.


Legalized gambling makes this activity available to too many people. Governments and casinos portray this as a harmless form of entertainment. Because of the availability of legalized gambling, it is more addictive and destructive than most other addictions.


Furthermore, most citizens would not gamble illegally. Legalized gambling, therefore, entices people to gamble, who normally would not gamble at all. In states with different numbers of games, participation rates increase steadily and sharply as the number of legal types of gambling increases. In fact, legalized gambling in various states has not been a competitor to, but rather has become a stimulator of illegal gambling.


The public is assured they have the potential to win a huge jackpot. All that is required is to drive to the casino or purchase a lottery ticket. Because of the availability of gambling, many gamblers become addicted and compulsive. Interested in how to quit gambling? Read more here.


3. Problem gambling costs society billions annually.


The social costs of gambling addictions will eventually impact careers, physical and mental health issues, bankruptcy, divorce, crimes, and treatment. The gamblers will eventually rely on welfare or unemployment benefits, impacting the government, and the costs could reach several billions of dollars per year.


4. Gambling exploits the poor.


Evidence shows that legalized gambling often hurts and even destroys, especially those who are poor and disadvantaged. If gambling were illegal, the gambling venues would not be able to promote their lotteries, casinos, or other forms of betting and exploit people who are most vulnerable.


5. Gambling sets a double standard for governments.


State lotteries are argueably an effective way to raise taxes. Legalized gambling is a disturbing governmental policy. Governments should promote desirable qualities in the citizens and not seduce them to gamble in state-sponsored vice. When this occurs, the government contributes to the corruption of society.


Legalized gambling is a bad social policy. At a time when independent organizations estimate that there are at least 12 million compulsive gamblers, it does not make a lot of sense to have the state promoting gambling. State sponsorship of gambling makes it harder, for the compulsive gambler to reform.


Compulsive gambling costs


In addition to the above reasons for making gambling illegals, are the economic costs that gamblers themselves incur. The average compulsive gambler has debts exceeding $80,000. Additionally, compulsive gamblers affect the lives of family, friends, and business associates. Some of the consequences of gambling include marital disharmony, divorce, child abuse, substance abuse, and suicide attempts. Other social costs surface because of family neglect, embezzlement, theft, and involvement in organized crime.


Crossing our fingers or wishing on a star will not guarantee a win. The only guarantee is, if a person is a compulsive gambler and continues to gamble, the end result is prison, insanity, or death. Whether gambling is legal or illegal, there will always be gamblers. Wanna bet?


Reference sources: probe [dot] org

Gambling: Should online gambling be banned, online casinos should be banned.


Gambling: Should online gambling be banned, online casinos should be banned.


Gambling: Should online gambling be banned, online casinos should be banned.


58 comments


Leave a reply cancel reply


Shame of the gov allowing this brutal corrupted business smh so many are homeless because of gambling sad sad


I would like to get philosophical for a moment. First and foremost, I am pro gambling, but I have never gambled in my life. My mother was mentally ill and squandered all of her money on a gambling addiction when I was in my early teens. I suffered and I endured. Moving on, gambling opponents seem to base their arguments on a few basic points: “I have seen someone go down this road before”, “it is harmful to others” or “gamblers are too addicted to have a choice.” to the first argument, a rational society has acknowledged that policy should not be based upon emotion. Believe me, I can empathize with these concerns, but when overly passionate individuals who shout above the rest are allowed to dictate national policy, both the will of the majority and the rights of the minority are often ignored. For instance, one of my family members had an excessive fondness for cats. Although she made very little money, she devoted nearly her entire paycheck to taking care of her animals, resulting in personal malnutrition and horrendous living conditions. Did this incident disturb me? Absolutely! But I very much doubt that anyone would agree that isolated cases such as this provide justification to illegalize cats. Now, as for it being harmful to others, there appear to be two prongs to this argument: society and family. As for society, it can be argued that virtually anything can have a negative impact on societal perceptions. Social media arguably results in a socially damaged society, but we would not illegalize that. Our increasingly sedentary lifestyle is arguably contributing to obesity, but we would not mandate exercise. Virtually everything can be construed to negatively impact societal mentality, meaning that effectively maintaining a “healthy” societal mentality would require prohibiting virtually everything. We must keep in mind that we are neither strictly individualistic nor strictly communal beings, and we have proven in the past that a community that respects individual freedom can function (after all, gambling been a part of our culture for millennia). As for the family, we have institutions in place for protecting abused or neglected children, but it is simply inpractical to prevent it at the source. Keep in mind the principle argument against gambling in this regard pertains to the notion that a gambling addiction results in less money for dependents which results in suffering. However, by that same logic, should we regulate everything to ensure that families have as much money as possible? Should we force at least one member of each family to work? Should we illegalize leisure spending for those with families? Should we mandate that those with larger families acquire more lucarative jobs? Obviously, these solutions are as authoritarian in spirit as they are absurd in practice, and what exactly distinguishes them from gambling? Finally, in regards to the argument that gambling addicts do not have a choice… I completely agree! However, I do not believe this lack of a choice justifies illegalization. Studies have shown that smartphones can be just as addictive as gambling, and yet I’m fairly certain that none of you would condemn service providers for “exploiting the powelessness of the addictive”. Keep in mind that things such as reading, exercising, and even working can be addictive as well, arguably rendering individuals powerless to make an alternate decision. However, the rights of the minority should not be able to be abolished by the will of the majority—the absolute dominance of the majority can be used to justify any number of horrendous acts (the holocaust and slavery come to mind). Simply because some people find gambling reprehensible doesn’t mean others should be forced to bow to this opinion. After all, virtually anything can be addictive and virtually everyone is opposed to something, so the notion that something should be illegalized when a potential for addiction and public opposition are found in conjunction would result in just about everything being prohibited (keep in mind that people are demonstrably less happy in totalitarian communities). Is our current system perfect? Absolutely not! But entrusting public policy and individual rights to an impassioned, vocal group creates far more problems than it solves.


So somehow adults can’t be responsible for their own addiction and need a government mandate to tell them what to do? Why should it not be someone’s conscious decision to engage in such an activity and what gives you the right to decide someone’s lifestyle? I’m not even a gambler, but it’s my money, so I’ll spend it how I want, and the nanny state and uninformed authoritarians such as yourself will not tell me differently.


Ban gambling, porn, coffe, softdrinks, smokes, alcohol it all destroying ppl… I AGREE with the op, in truth this stuff exsists because of evil ppl, it not good for ppl at all. There is also spiritual impacts ppl are not aware off.


I too think gambling should be banned. Yes, a few people get rich but everyone else loses their money. It’s not worth it.


Gambling is a killer and it ruins lives lets ban it please


I’ve been reading up on many stories about embezzlement going on, which goes from 6 figures to 7 figures. Holy cow, there is a serious problem that needs to be addressed here. Communities should not be keeping these things in business. No way.


I used to go to casinos for fun. I can’t, in good conscience, go to any anymore. It’s just wrong.


Everyone is responsible for making their own decisions. If someone is stupid they will ruin their lives with alcohol addiction or something else legal. Prohibition is a complete failure. People need not impose their self righteous morality on people trying to make a living how they choose. What is it to you if someone makes money investing, or sports betting. This country is oppressive in its taxes and lack of liberty.


I would like to say that gambling can be an addiction and for the poor vulnerable person this should not be given a choice to try and make his money grow through gambling this game we play with ourselves can damage a whole family not just yourself and take peoples lives the whole gambling process is to let you loss your money its not made for you to win ok you may win once or twice but i know that the money you have given will not add up to the amount you would of spent gambling should be made illegal


Casinos constantly monitor the movements of their customers (gamblers) while inside their facilities and will use any excuse to ban or harass such if they complain. For example, security staff at rama have arrested people on suspicion of theft for merely bending over to pick up a lost roulette chip or pack of gum.


Your problem is that you are too lazy to spend the 20 years or so needed for success in this,the most demanding of all disciplines.It requires far more dedication than it does for anything else.When surgeons are getting drunk in the hamptons on saturday night,baseball bettors are burning the midnight oil working on sunday’s games.


FOR: LIBERTY gambling is a choice and everyone is free to make a good or bad choice as long as it doesn’t infringe the rights of others


In other words, “some people have a problem with gambling so no one should be allowed to gamble.” when does it stop?


This is ridiculous… all the people that think the government needs to step in so people don’t make bad choices is retarded. The arguments are extremely weak as well.


Every argument you make against gambling you can make literally against any addictive activity/substance.
“you can throw away your whole life savings in one night of gambling.” uhm… what about drinking drunk and killing others and yourself? It can all happen in one night if you don’t control yourself.
“people will neglect their families and feed their gambling addictions.” replace gambling addictions with alcohol, drugs, sex addictions and you get the same result.


Basically it shouldn’t be the government that tell you how to live your life. If you want to do something that doesn’t harm another, go for it. If you aren’t competent to take care of your family, the government should take your kids from you.


To all those saying gambling should be legal because freedom is liberty etc, what utter bullshit. How many things are illegal that by the same definition should be legalised? If your mind isn’t dark enough to consider the possibilities then I’m glad for you, but you are seriously sheltered in your perception. Gambling is doing exactly what drug dealers do, exploiting an addiction. Alcohol and cigarettes are both heavily regulated, the tax on cigarettes is so high in the UK that despite manufacturing the product we are paying over two times what the rest of europe does, furthermore they can’t even display cigarettes in shops, no advertising is allowed for cigarettes and each packet comes with either a large sign saying ‘smoking kills’ et al or a rather graphic photo of the consequences of smoking. So this is a product that whilst can do great damage in the long term has very little short term affects, it certainly can’t destroy yours and your family’s world in one evening like gambling could. Gambling doesn’t just exploit an addiction, but it’s effects are so sparse and integrated into contemporary society that the full measure of its corruption goes unmissed. Each company somehow manages to play by differing rules, regarding their procedures, payouts etc and the gambling commission are no more than an urban legend, never actually doing anything to implement or safeguard the ‘industry’, having worked at a bookies for 5 years I never once met anyone outside the company who came to audit or verify that everything was being kept within the letter of the law, and I know working there it wasn’t! We were told our main focus group was males aged 18-30, thus those most impressionable and easily swayed by the lure of something with idealistic propositions.


There will be thousands of ideas that no-one ever considered allowing to prosper in this world due to them being highly immoral, yet we allow gambling to remain in the heart of society despite it clearly being a burden to anyone who gets involved. At least drugs allow you to escape the reality of life, gambling only serves to heighten the problems, and this is usually the case whether you win or lose.


I didn’t even mention the close connection gambling has to crime and criminal organisations who use this as a means to launder their money, something I experienced working in london with albanian gangsters not even caring what happened to their money as they only needed to have physical proof they could legitimise their current cashflow. This isn’t prohibition, nobody is going to start opening up underground casinos, the majority of gamblers would move on, deal with it and probably be the happier and wealthier for it, and out of all the people I know with an addiction, 99% would welcome such a ban. But the bottom line here is that the government in the UK attempted to block the freedom gambling sites and companies had, instead they simply decided to raise the tax, meaning that betting companies now needed to increase profits, and remember this money only comes from the general public, no items are being sold, no services provided, this is literally people giving money for nothing, so what does it becomes, another way that the government was able to grease its palms? This is the kind of freedom that we should be fighting for? I can go and blow all my money on nothing, destroy my future, get myself in debt, ruin my relationships with family and friends because of a brutal addiction I never wanted, but fuck at least I am doing it in the name of freedom. Fucking double standard ignorance.


Banning casino is a MUST. Over those past year,quite number of people suicide due to gambling. It’s either you come out with alot of money or broke af. Theres no 100% win rates on gambling,theres no luck.Some people even standing outside of a casino to borrow money to, with a high interest. How the fuck you can do that? Borrow money for people to suicide you mean? Gambling has been legalized by many states, but just because it is does not make it right. Even though gambling is legal, it should not be because of its harmful economic, governmental, and social effects.There are a few different damaging effects that gambling has on the government, but they fall into two categories: the government’s role and illegal activity. The government’s role in gambling is not what it should be. Drugs and gambling are both known to be self-destructive, yet drugs are banned and gambling is legalized?


Gambling is all over our TV stations in the UK and we pay for this crap it should not be allowed. We pay a licence for our channels and it should bring good family TV all night long not this shit and we have to pay for it. Smoking has been banned so why not this.


Why gambling is good and should not be banned


Gambling: Should online gambling be banned, online casinos should be banned.


There is no need to argue, but gambling became very popular today. More and more people start playing online every day. Why does it happen? Is this just an entertainment or an additional source of income? Should casinos be banned? We’ll try to answer all these questions because the opinions about online gambling are entirely different today.


In current times, there is a bunch of online casinos. It means that if you have a desire to try your luck, you can pick up the best online crap joint, and immerse yourself in the gameplay without the necessity to visit this casino personally. For instance, qatar online casino website offers a wide array of online games. It means that gamblers don’t feel the lack of choice. They will always find a fantastic online activity to spend time during a coffee break or pass the time in the evening.


Gambling: Should online gambling be banned, online casinos should be banned.


Nevertheless, some users consider that gambling is illegal and it should be banned. Why do they think so? Is it possible to do this?


The key reasons why online gambling should not be banned


Though some people consider all kinds of casinos illegal, that’s not true. Going by that logic, alcohol, drugs, and cigarettes should also be banned. If a person can’t control the situation, this is not the problem of the manufacturer of alcoholic beverages or cigarettes. The same is with the online gambling.


Below, you can find the main reasons why the gambling area should not be banned.


1. This is just pure fun.


Every person has a choice. The same is with the gambler. The principal purpose of this area is to provide a player with the feeling of risk. It also brings entertainment. Thus, it is not honest to blame the gambling industry only because players can’t control themselves. If you are a gambling person who simply can’t stop, you shouldn’t play for real money at all.


2. Gambling doesn’t influence the society.


This is a good method of relaxation for some people. After a hard working day, they come to a brick-and-mortar or online casino and relax. Some experts consider that this is a form of therapy allowing players to switch the attention.


It also helps train some skills. When you play some games, you develop your strategy. You think of how you should behave in one or another situation. Thus, you not only relax but train your brain as well.


Gambling is a choice of a person. It can’t influence the whole society.


3. Casinos attract tourists.


Gambling: Should online gambling be banned, online casinos should be banned.


If a casino is located in a tourist place, it will attract players from different countries. For instance, people come to this city in order to have a rest, enjoy the sea, etc. In the evening, they visit casinos, relax, play and win! Otherwise stated, this is a fair opportunity to vary their vacation.


4. People should be at liberty.


The government can’t decide for everyone what activities are legal and which ones should be banned. People have the right to choose how they want to spend their free time. Even if this activity is banned, they will always find the ways to get around the law and continue playing. For that reason, the prohibition on online gambling will not work. Truly gamblers will always see how to access their favorite casinos or find the other ones to experience the gameplay.


5. It boosts the economy of the country.


Legalized gambling can boost the economy of the country. This is an additional source of income allowing the government to cover some expenses. When casinos are illegal, it means the country loses the additional revenue.


Agree or disagree: gambling should be banned


I agree with the statement that gambling should be banned. There are three reasons for this opinion. There would be more criminal activity if society allowed gambling, gambling negatively affects family relations, and gambling could lead to health problems.


Gambling is often the cause of criminal activities. Mafia members could use the money for illegal or dangerous purposes. So, I recommend that we do not have gambling facilities. Also, gamblers could start fighting each other or cause problems about money.


Gambling could affect family relations, because gamblers focus on gambling too much and they do not take care of their families. Thus, gambling could be the cause of divorce or domestic violence. For example, if a father gambles too much and does not come home until late at night, it could harm his relationship with his family.


Finally, gambling could have negative effect on health, because gambling too much could make people too excited and they would be unable to maintain good health. For instance, gamblers might stay up late at night to gamble for long hours so they could easily catch a cold or become ill.


In conclusion, gambling should be banned because there would be more criminal activities if people allowed it, it would negatively affect family relations, and it could damage people’s health.


I agree with the statement that g ambling should be banned.


There are three reasons to support my idea. (better: "there are three reasons I believe this:" or "I have three reasons for this opinion:" although I think that "reasons to support" is grammatically valid, I don't know that I've ever heard it phrased like that. I recommend combining this sentence and the next with a colon, but that's a stylistic choice.)



    these reasons are that there would be more criminal activities if the society allowed gambling, gambling affect negatively for the family relations, and gambling could lead to health problems.

These reasons are that there would be more criminal activit y if the society allowed gambling, gambling affect negatively affects for the family relations, and gambling could lead to health problems.



    One of the reasons that gambling should be banned is that gambling could be the cause of criminal activities.

One of the reasons that gambling should be banned is that G ambling could be is often the cause of criminal activities. (you have introduced your thesis with your three points, and so it makes sense that this paragraph will be the first topic in detail, without repeating the main point. I think gambling has been linked to crime often enough - google "gambling and crime" for a bunch of articles - that you can state this without weakening it with "could be.")


Mafia members could use the money for illegal purposes or dangerous purposes reasons .


So, it is I recommend ed that we not to have gambling facilities.



    The other reason is that gambling could affect on family relations, because gamblers focus gambling too much and they do not take care of their families.

The other reason is that G ambling could affect on family relations, because gamblers focus on gambling too much and they do not take care of their families. (you can only use "the other ____" when there are only two options.)


So thus , gambling could be the cause of divorce or domestic violence. (starting a sentence with "so" is okay in informal writing, but "thus" or "therefore" or "because of this" are better for formal writing.)



    for example, if father gamble too much and do not come home until late at night, it could influence badly of the family relationship.

For example, if a father gamble s too much and do es not come home until late at night, it could influence badly of the family relationship harm his relationship with his family .



    One more reason is that gambling could have negative effect on health, because gambling too much could make people too excited and they could not keep good health conditions.

One more reason is that finally, gambling could have negative effect on health, because gambling too much could make people too excited and they could not keep good health conditions would be unable to maintain good health . ("finally" or "lastly" are better choices to introduce your final argument in a paper like this.)


For instance, gamblers would might stay up late at night to gamble for long hours ,


S o , they could easily catch a cold or become ill.



    As a conclusion, gambling should be banned, because there would be more criminal activities if people allowed it, it would affect negatively on family relations, and it could damage people’s health.

As a in conclusion, gambling should be banned , because there would be more criminal activities if people allowed it, it would affect negatively affect on family relations, and it could damage people’s health. ("in conclusion" is a set phrase.)


How do you feel about state-sponsored gambling, like lotteries? A lot of states in the US have lotteries that pay for things like schools and transportation systems. I'm sure there are people who spend too much money on them, but I like that the money goes to good causes.


7 ways to get yourself banned from casinos


It is not as hard to get banned from a casino as most people think. Of course, a player just minding their own business will probably not be kicked out of a casino. When a player is disruptive to casino operations, oftentimes security will step in and ask the patron to leave and never return. Here are seven ways to get banned from a casino.


When a casino suspects that a gambler is cheating, they will immediately ban the gambler for life. Of course, if the casino catches a player in the act, the establishment will probably get local law enforcement involved. If they catch a gambler stealing, they will promptly call the police and never allow that the gambler in the casino again.


Another way patrons get banned from casinos is by requesting a ban. A lot of people with gambling problems do not know where to turn for help. With this option, a gambler can contact a casino and sign a waiver disallowing their right to enter the premises. This is a last resort for an addicted gambler. Other times, a player will be kicked out and subsequently banned when they drink too much or start problems and fights with other patrons.


Sometimes, a casino will extend credit to a gambler. Credit is a fantastic way for a high net worth gambler to have a good time without carrying a lot of cash. Unfortunately, a lot of gamblers on credit will skip out on their bill. If a player does not pay their gambling debts, the gambler will be promptly banned from entering the premises. Other players have received lifetime bans for being sore losers. Some of the more high-profile gamblers had made scenes when they lost a lot of money, and subsequently received lifetime bans from the casino.


Finally, a casino will kick out and ban any gambler with illegal drugs. The reality is, they will see every step and every move a patron makes. If they spot a patron with illegal drugs, they will ask the patron to leave and never return. Of course, most casinos will also inform the local authorities when the encounter a gambler with illegal drugs.


The truth is a smart gambler who does not break any laws or rules should be fine. Most people that receive casino bans probably deserve the ban. A gambler needs to be careful as most casinos communicate with each other about a lot of issues. When a patron receives a ban at one casino, he or she will have trouble getting into other local casinos.


“should online gambling be banned?”


Please join studymode to read the full document


You may also find these documents helpful


Should online gambling be legalized? Research paper

. NO. Online gamblingepartment of justice considers such activities illegal. Several U.S. Lawmakers are trying to crack down on the industry by clarifying existing U.S. Laws and making it easier to go after offenders. One of those measures, the unlawful internet gambling enforcement act, seeks to curb online gambling by trying to cut off the money supply: the bill would outlaw the use of credit cards, checks or money transfers to settle wagers. The bill is sponsored by rep. Jim leach (R-iowa). The wall street journal online asked rep. Leach and david carruthers, chief executive of betonsports plc, an online sports book and casino based in costa rica, to debate whether internet gambling should be banned in the U.S. Theirs of the internet are counterproductive for society. When consumers deal with an offshore entity, they give their personal financial information to unknown individuals, who, by definition, are engaged in criminal activity. Internet casinos introduce a gaming room in homes, offices and school dormitories with bettors who abdicate the comprehensive protections afforded by U.S. Law. Offshore internet gambling sites sweep dollars out of the U.S. Into largely unknown, often criminal hands. The potential threat of identity theft and fraud is high for the individual bettor just as the risk posed to our national security.


Essay about online games should be banned by the government

. Due to the unpleasant effects on children, online games should be banned by the government. Firstly, online games totally distract children from studying. Instead of listening carefully to what teachers say in class, young gamers often think or chat with their friends about how they can improve their ability in the games or where are they going to hang out in their cyber world and so on. Moreover, after school, they just go straight to the computers, ignoring their homework and lessons to review, letting their grades lower more and more. The best example for this case is me. I was in grade 7 when I started being addicted to one of the online demon software. I completely stopped paying attention in class and countdown to my free time to spend on the game, and the consequence of it surprisingly made me drop from the top ten students in class to the bottom ten. Apart from the in-class distraction and irresponsibility, online games cost a great deal of money. The longer children spend time on it, the more money it takes. This doesn’t only mean the costs of home internet service or internet café usage, but also the games themselves have to be top up with money. Altogether it costs more than 500 baht a week, which is considered very excessive. Though ‘money’ is not a big deal, ‘finding money’ really is. According to ms. Yu-jin lee, an experienced news reporter from ABC thailand.


Online gambling and social responsibility essay

. social responsibility of the online gaming industry the gaming industry does not escape as any other industry in acting responsibly and being sensible to the society in which it operates. Since the early 50s and 60s when the gaming industry was targeted and tagged as one controlled by criminals, and as cited earlier in this paper, the industry has been regulated constantly to prevent customers to be the target and profit and limit the expansion of the gambling criminal activities. But with the constant regulatory eye of the government, how can’t the gaming industry act as any other where the main purpose of business activity is the creation of profits? In an attempt to portray the main and traditional intention of a business, cavico explains that a corporation main purpose in our society is the profitable production and distribution of goods and services (cavico, 2009). In fact, that is how corporations invest money in a business opportunity to create profits, and gradually based on the market and business condition, look for an expansion of their operations in the search for more opportunities and profits. The online gaming industry, domestic or international, has this intent as their main purpose of existence. Exploring the social responsible side of corporations, john bussey in a wall street journal article, introduces a justification why companies would benefit from adopting the social responsible side, by mentioning.


Gambling should be legalized. Essay

. Gambling should be legalized what is gambling? According to www.Dictionary.Com gambling is taking a risk in the hope of gaining an advantage or a benefit. Gambling has been around for centuries and has been dated way back to 1492. People have been gambling in america ever since america was found. There are numerous underground cards clubs and casinos all over the country and in major cities. People gamble on everything: sports evens, dice, and cards. Even though people gamble every day in the united states, it is still illegal. People do gamble everyday, so why is it not legal. Gambling should be legalized. There are tons of ways to gamble. Anybody can pretty much gamble or make a bet on anything. Some major games though are cards. People play games such as poker or blackjack. Also, betting on horses and dogs has been around quit a bit. The biggest form of gambling though is the lottery. Most of these games and events are already legal such has the track and the lottery, but why are regular games like poker and blackjack illegal? Why gamble? What good can come from gambling? Gambling can help our economy by keeping money here in out on state. "proponents say it keeps money in the state" (legalized gambling 2). Another huge reason on why gambling should be legalized in the fact.


Cigarette should be banned essay

. Cigarettes should be banned smoking cigarettes has been a worldwide habit for a long time. According to the world health organization report, about 2 billion people smoke all over the world, 48% men and 12% women and even a number of child smokers. Everyone knows the harm of cigarettes and many countries have published smoking bans. The himalayan kingdom of bhutan was the first one to forbid tobacco sales (BBC news). I strongly approve of the cigarette ban because cigarette is bad for people’s health and the litter will cause environmental pollution. I do not smoke, so I have no idea how exactly people feel when they smoke. Some people smoke to keep their weight, others need cigarettes to focus on something, and some believe smoking is pleasant and refreshing. There is a funny saying that chinese heavy smokers always say, “ smoking after dinner is more than living god.” no matter the reason that people like smoking, they should not ignore the disadvantages of cigarettes. My grandfather died from lung cancer in 2008. He had smoked more than fifty years. I would not say that he died because of smoking, but we cannot deny that lung cancer is indeed a tobacco-related disease. Smoking speeds up the process of aging and each cigarette smoked costs smokers six minutes of their life (hubpages). Every year, tobacco kills almost six million people, which includes five million users and ex users and even more that.


Reality shows should be banned essay

. Reality shows should be banned? The main essence of reality shows is to put ordinary people in a social confined setting with extraordinary environment and activities with the aim of entertaining audiences with the illusion that what is going on is not scripted nor rehearsed. Most reality shows attempt to convince the audience that the participants of the show are being pushed to their physical, emotional or physiological limits in order to complete a specific task or attain a certain goal of which audience cheer on their favorite participant. With the change in times and technology most reality shows have gone over board and have forgotten the basic concept of reality shows and are now focusing more on entertainment than reality that has lead to increase in sexual exposure, humiliation and immorality. Reality shows have lost their way from original series like survivor to the new mediocre series of two celebrities living in a farm yard for a week. Reality TV has joined the ranks of day time entertainment and has lost the spark of spontaneous originality from other forms of scripted entertainment. Additionally, the most famous reality shows worldwide are big brother and idols; these two are examples of scripted and well rehearsed reality shows. In the just concluded episode of idols a judge was dared to sing out of the blue and it so happened just by “coincidence” that the band started playing a song which the judge joined in emphatically.


Should surveillance technology be banned? Essay

. Surveillance technology such as RFID (radio-frequency identification) should not be used to track people (e.G. Human implants and RFID tags on people or products). Do you agree? Support your argument with concrete examples. Famous novelist george orwell once wrote in his novel nineteen eighty-four, “there was of course no way of knowing whether you were being watched at any given moment…in the assumption that every sound you made was overheard, and, except in darkness, every movement scrutinized.” (george orwell's, 1984 - telescreen and the surveillance society) although the issue on surveillance technology invading human’s privacy has been an ongoing concern, surveillance technology has also brought us lots of benefits and security. Firstly, it enhanced the security system in many areas. Secondly, it facilitates the tracking of school children and the elderly. Lastly, with the help of surveillance technology, information can be accessed instantly. Hence, surveillance technology should be used to track people. Video surveillance such as closed circuit television (CCTV) is highly employed in many key installations such as government institutes, military bases, airports and ports to enhance security. It can also be found in schools and hospitals. CCTV is able to provide a 24/7 security manning without too much human resources as real time video images will be sent to the control centre. For instance, schools can use it to track intruders.


Essay on should mobile phones be banned?

. yasmin kabir 10D ms home- ENGLISH word count: 790 dear sir, I am writing to you to express my opinions about your recent article (should mobile phones be banned in schools? – 27/11/12). This subject is definitely a hard topic to discuss due to the fact mobile phones have made a huge impact to our generation. I was intrigued by the writers’ perspectives and by the contrast of their viewpoints. In the first paragraph of barkham’s article, he talks about the many fears of teens having the ability to use their devices in school. These include how it may “unleash cyber bullying” and how people may break rules by taking a “video up teacher’s skirts”. However, the fact that he uses the terms “strangely feared” and “assumed” declares that he believes these worries to be silly and nonsensical. He points out how the schools are against this modern leap are unable to afford their own IT facilities and yet continue to “ignore the powerful computers in every pupil’s pockets.” barkham highlights what could be taken as hypocrisy and complete disregard on the school’s behalf, and how moving past this could prove to be very useful for everyone involved. He also praises how phones are a revolutionary product. To back up his argument, the writer notes how he went and got first-hand information about the matter. In this paragraph, he tells us about how teachers find it “useful” having students with phones in class. So useful in fact that.




So, let's see, what we have: gambling: should online gambling be banned? Stop it now. It serves only the casino proprieters. It preys on weak willed participants who are often the least able to afford to lose money. There at online casinos should be banned

No comments:

Post a Comment